April 24, 2023
Are we being experimented on?
Do you know what Lanthanum is? Did you know Lanthanum is being broadcast into our lakes, rivers, and water supplies? Why is this soft metal that you have likely never heard of being put into our waters? The sales pitch is to kill Algae because of too much Phosphorus. That’s almost laughable if it wasn’t already being done. We can see how the same “it’s a good thing” template for Fluoride was used. How marketing was implemented against Algae. Arguably one of the most important food sources in our food chain. However, these two; Fluoride and Lanthanum together, draw an alarming connection. Let’s go through it.
The Australian company Phoslock with WEF (World Economic Forum) ties and CCP production says it’s good to kill your algae with their product containing Lanthanum. Lanthanum absorbs and robs as much phosphorus in your water supply as it can. That affects all plant life and the animals that use plants for habitat, mating, and food. We will just focus on the sales pitch bad Algae. Algae is a biofilter and food source. If Algae was getting too much phosphorus, then the algae would be visibly turning yellow and dying not growing. Plants need phosphorus unless they get too much. As a biofilter, Algae is only toxic if the water it is in is toxic. Since overabundance of Phosphorus is not killing all the plants then it appears that is not the toxicity issue. So, the water should be addressed elsewhere, what we can’t get rid of is Fluoride and I wrote an article about that earlier which you can read. Getting back to Lanthanum, why and How is Phoslock somehow making contracts with your governments to put largely unchecked substances into your water sources? Why are government officials and articles saying Phoslock is bentonite clay when it’s not just bentonite clay? Why are we dumping Chinese-produced Phoslock / Lanthanum into our water? Why are we dumping Chinese-produced Fluoride into our water?
To understand today’s Lanthanum / Phoslock situation let's go back to the old-world sale pitch start of Fluoride. I get the old-world sales pitch of Fluoride of its good for your teeth. Although like every sales pitch that’s just nonsense, it’s always for you. People have suffered years of low-dose chronic Fluoride poisoning and do so unchanged today. Most sales pitches don’t inform you at all of the negative side effects of their product. Any product creates side effects. You just have to determine if the side effect you wanted is one of them. Then if so, you see that as positive. The side effects that you don’t want are negative side effects. A sale persons job is to devalue the negative sides of what they are selling you and fluff or conflate the side effect you do want. Even if that effect is nonexistent or minor. That’s a well-understood position of a salesperson with a good product or not. Most salespeople, depending on what they are selling, have to convince themselves that the positive side effects are better than the negative side effects for the client. They may have to lower their morals to avoid talking about the negatives or lying about the negatives. Some salespeople may be really good talkers but just unintelligent enough to not realize the negatives are bigger than expected. They just figure they are doing their job and defer responsibility to their boss to tell them how to sell the product. Money and making a living is a big incentives to believe what you’re selling is better than it is or look the other way. That’s why lust for money is often viewed as a sin.
Oil Companies and other Industries have always needed to get rid of toxic byproduct wastes. Their waste is a negative cost to producing their product. Oil used to be the biggest producer of oil and money in the world. Fluoride is one of those toxic waste byproducts of their industry. So, the old-world idea of sprinkling Fluoride throughout the world at “nontoxic” levels and selling it as something desirable is an old Con to not pay for and account for negative byproducts the industry creates. Kind of like nuclear waste is a costly byproduct waste of creating nuclear power. If that was marketed and resold as a health drink in small doses that would be horrific. That likely would not kill people right away but eventually, the accumulation is radioactive enough to detect so the game would be up. Sadly, Fluoride accumulation in our bodies has had stealth health consequences pointed out over and over again for many years, it's just not radioactive to detect. Fluoride was a rat poison used as gas in warfare. Those people sounding the alarm in the past later find themselves marginalized and beaten back by the money that’s behind Fluoride. Europe had voted down Fluoride in their water to later just find Fluoride distributed in their food. Big industry at times doesn’t seem to care if people’s interest conflict if they can go right to officials to make unelected policies with lobbyists and donations. They care about not losing money and finding a way to eliminate costly toxic waste from their bottom line. To do that, sometimes making a lobbyist group and selling something instead as a healthy idea along with well-placed donations makes the difference. When you develop a body burden of Fluoride that you can’t eliminate every day, for instance, it will start absorbing into your cells mostly made of water. Your veins and artery cell lining, your teeth, and your bones. Fluoride will initially displace calcium in your teeth and bones. When your body creates and adapts your skeletal structure using Fluoride in place of or combined with calcium it makes sense you will have a somewhat more fragile skeletal structure over time. A fragile skeletal structure is called osteoporosis. Porous teeth are called cavities. Cavities can be deterred and maybe slightly filled with Fluoride binding to the calcium in your teeth. That’s the sales pitch. Since Calcium and Fluoride are found together in nature, they are shown to naturally molecularly bind to one another. That’s not great news if your arteries and veins' cell walls which are made up largely of water are saturated with a slow accumulation of Fluoride. Calcium attaching to the inner linings of your blood vessels is now called cardiovascular disease. I also wrote an article on how Fluoride could affect the calcium in our shellfish and coral around the world. That is alarming. Okay, that’s Fluoride in a nutshell,
How does Lanthanum relate? Well, let’s see, what is the biggest money-producer industry today, it's supposedly not big oil any longer. Big tech has now outpaced the billionaires of big oil these days. This doesn’t mean big oil is getting less influential. Their industry is just recreating itself into hydrogen. The same oil different product rebranded as green. You may have noticed in the tech billionaires and their workers big tech folks and scientists these days are just salivating over getting people closer to transhuman ideas to keep up with AI. They feel we need diagnostics and treatments of people done by mixing chemistry and radio waves together and then affecting cancer tumors and reading organ function and developing nanoparticles to affect and read brain function or thoughts. Big tech wants to download your thoughts to large buildings called data centers being built like crazy. They inversely call the data storage of everything the “cloud” when its definition is furthest from the truth. Data storage is actually on the ground using enormous electricity to run and enormous water to keep cool. The exact opposite of what we are supposed to be desired for our personal use in our society. We are supposed to almost not use energy and almost not use water. They want to create a future metaverse everyone exists in more so even than the real physical world. If you’re paying attention at all you have read or heard a talk on different subjects of big tech and nanotech and everyone is on the edge of their seat about where to make their next multiple-million-dollar gamble.
Big tech and Lanthanum are our new pollutants making their way onto center stage and into our water. Lanthanum in Phoslock is a silvery malleable metal that oxidizes and off-gases easily in water. Lanthanum when combined with Fluoride creates molecules easily absorbed into our bodies. Lanthanum and Fluoride together make items much more sensitive to radio frequencies. That means if your body is being exposed to Lanthanum / Fluoride over time you will be able to respond better to all kinds of technology being distributed and experimented with. Let’s look at some examples where being more sensitive would be helpful for big tech experiments; Diagnostic detection for organ functions health industry, buying products from stores, detection around any location in the world, connection to local Wi-Fi reading as you roam around, detection and feedback by 5g and 6g towers going up everywhere every few miles along roadways everywhere. Are there negative side effects to being more radiosensitive? Yea, I would think so given that we were not made that way. Also, evidence of the 5g towers & smart meter effects is alarming already without enhanced sensitivity. You can read many articles and studies on the effects of 5g. At lower doses than we experience, there have been links to brain cancers, headaches, biological cell degradation, and immunity collapse responses from this technology without an increased sensitivity that Lanthanum and Fluoride could implement. I can’t imagine all the side effects if our body chronically accumulates Fluoride and Lanthanum particles. Another thing most people don’t realize is calcium is actually a metal. So, your teeth and skeletal structure are largely a type of metal. Pretty fascinating. So, Lanthanum would connect to fluoride which can then connect and build within your skeleton, brain, and organs to make you into a more sensitive antenna. Have you ever had a phone, computer, website, electronic wallet, electronic identity, or credit card information stolen? Yeah, I bet you or someone you know has. Electronics are hackable. Then there are always updates. Updates are ridiculous, often changing the use, changing your rights, going from free to costly services after you get dependent, and trying to keep up with hackers as well. It’s just not a natural world so what could go wrong with mixing these two things in our bodies?
So, I raise the question- Are we being experimented on? In a time when big tech has entered medicine and we just went through and are still going through an experimental injection originally classified as an illegal gene therapy, to then later be redefined and sold as a vaccine, could we be being additionally experimented on for big tech with Lanthanum and Fluoride as a combination in our water?
What can 5g towers and data centers going up everywhere combined with Lanthanum and Fluoride do to our bodies? Can they make us sick and then get blamed for something else?
The biggest cons get people to believe it was their fault or something they did in their life to cause negative results- not the industry. So, it's best when you’re doing an experiment to keep things quiet and the technology unknown until you figure it out. Otherwise, a mistake could cost an industry and be taken down and not last for years and years. Let’s look at some past examples; do 4 out of 5 doctors still recommend smoking for your health and calm nerves? Is DDT still sprayed in your neighborhood and in your home to kill pests? Is asbestos still the best thing to use in your siding, ducting wraps, ceiling tiles, or cooking mittens? Is lead still great for your water pipes and paint? Why are we not allowed to protest a tower in our neighborhood or remove Fluoride from our water? Why isn’t something like Lanthanum going into our water common knowledge or going up for a community vote? Take a look at this attached article from 7 years ago about Lanthanum and Fluoride. Obviously, people that worked on the nuclear bomb thought they were doing good research to help the world stay safe and spread democracy. Then maybe at some point realized it was likely the opposite. I suspect there are a lot of people out there doing what they see as important work to later find it to be used for nefarious purposes or profit instead of what they were sold they were working on their subject. I can’t see any rightful and good things coming from poisons being put in our bodies combined with towers all over that none of us want in our neighborhoods and along our roads. Below is a positive reason for research to sell the idea of increasing our bodily radio sensitization. Sadly 7 years ago I think these authors believed that what they are doing will just be used for good in the medical field. I just don’t see that perspective as the main influence when I research and find lanthanum and Fluoride being dumped into our water without any open honest discourse and vote of the people. See my past articles on Phoslock, Fluoride, and Atrazine.
Sean Phillips
Reference:
Lanthanum fluoride nanoparticles for radiosensitization of tumors
- K. Kudinov, Devesh Bekah, Daniel R Cooper, S. Shastry, Colin Hill, S. Bradforth, J. Nadeau less
- Published in SPIE BiOS 22 April 2016
- Chemistry, Physics, Biology
Dense inorganic nanoparticles have recently been identified as promising radiosensitizers. In addition to dose enhancement through increased attenuation of ionizing radiation relative to biological tissue, scintillating nanoparticles can transfer energy to coupled photosensitizers to amplify the production of reactive oxygen species, as well as provide UVvisible emission for optical imaging. Lanthanum fluoride is a transparent material that is easily prepared as nanocrystals, and which can provide radioluminescence at a number of wavelengths through simple substitution of lanthanum ions with other luminescent lanthanides. We have prepared lanthanum fluoride nanoparticles doped with cerium, terbium, or both, that have good spectral overlap with chlorine6 or Rose Bengal photosensitizer molecules. We have also developed a strategy for stable conjugation of the photosensitizers to the nanoparticle surface, allowing for high energy transfer efficiencies on a per-molecule basis. Additionally, we have succeeded in making our conjugates colloidally stable under physiological conditions. Here we present our latest results, using nanoparticles and nanoparticle-photosensitizer conjugates to demonstrate radiation dose enhancement in B16 melanoma cells. The effects of nanoparticle treatment prior to 250 kVp x-ray irradiation were investigated through clonogenic survival assays and cell cycle analysis. Using a custom apparatus, we have also observed scintillation of the nanoparticles and conjugates under the same conditions that the cell samples are irradiated.